Inside This Issue
Front
Page
Welcome
Last
Chance To Register For This Year's West Coast Conference April 27-30,
2006 Carmel, CA
2006
Summer Montessori Leadership Institute Online!
Tomorrow's
Child Special Early Bird Discount Offer Ends May 1st
Montessori
Centenary Conference in Rome, January 6-7, 2007
Schools
Cut Back Other Subjects to Push Reading & Math
Some
Thoughts On Collaboration
Montessori
Representatives Present At Oxford Round Table
Partnership
Education
Partnership
Education in Action
Teaching
in Beijing
Facilities:
Keeping Playgrounds Safe
Finances:
Awarding Financial Aid and Scholarships
Montessori
School of Maui Named “Leading Edge” Independent School
How
Companies Learn How to Sell Stuff to Kids
Tomorrow's
Child: The Magazine For Montessori Families
Classified
Ads
Calendar
|
Some Thoughts on Human Collaboration
by Seth Kahan
A colleague of mine recently pointed me toward a recent
issue of Science Magazine which had three interesting articles that
explore aspects of colaboration:
In Chimpanzees Recruit the Best Collaborators,
Mellis, Hare and Tomasello say, “…recognizing when collaboration
is necessary and determining who is the best collaborative partner
are skills shared by both chimpanzees and humans, so such skills
may have been present in their common ancestor before humans evolved
their own complex forms of collaboration.”
In Who Are More Helpful, Humans or Chimpanzees?,
Silk says “Humans, including infants, are more willing than closely-related
chimpanzees to cooperate and behave altruistically and cooperatively,
probably in part accounting for their evolutionary success. ”
In Altruistic Helping in Human Infants and Young Chimpanzees,
Warneken and Tomasello say, “Human beings routinely help others
to achieve their goals, even when the helper receives no immediate
benefit and the person helped is a stranger. Such altruistic behaviors
(toward non-kin) are extremely rare evolutionarily, with some theorists
even proposing that they are uniquely human.”
What is collaboration?
I checked the collaboration entry in the Wikipedia and was surprised
to read, “Although the word collaboration is widely used in many
varying contexts such as education, science, art and business, very
little research has been carried out to determine the properties
of this process,” and “Currently there exists no unifying general
theory of collaboration.” Wow! Couldn’t be!
Digging around a bit more I found this “No single theoretical perspective
provides an adequate foundation for a general theory of collaboration…”
in an abstract on “Collaborative Alliances: Moving from Practice
to Theory” by Barabara Gray and Donna J. Wood in the Journal for
Behavioral Science.
Of course, there are definitions for collaboration floating around.
Here are three:
"Collaboration is a relational system in which two or more
stakeholders pool together
resources in order to meet objectives that neither could meet individually."
(Graham, J. R. & Barter, K. (1999). Collaboration: A social work
practice method. Families in society: The Journal of Contemporary
Social Services, 80, 6-13.).
“Collaboration is a mutually beneficial and well-defined relationship
entered into by two or more organizations to achieve common goals.
The relationship includes a commitment to: a definition of mutual
relationships and goals; a jointly developed structure and shared
responsibility; mutual authority and accountability for success;
and sharing of resources and rewards.” (Mattessich, P. W. &
Monsey, B. R. (1992). Collaboration: What makes it work: A review
of research literature on factors influencing successful collaboration.
St. Paul, MI: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.).
“Collaboration occurs when a group of autonomous stakeholders
of a problem domain engage in an interactive process, using shared
rules, norms, and structures to act or decide on issues related
to that domain.” (Wood, D. J. & Gray, B. (1991). Toward a comprehensive
theory of collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
27(2), 139-162).
I asked some of my colleagues recently to suggest a real-life or
folk-hero icon that expresses the essence of collaboration. I got
all kinds of answers including, Ghandi (India), Hiawatha (Iroquois
nations), William “Braveheart” Wallace (Scotland), King Ashoka (India),
Nelson Mandela (South Africa), Joseph McCormick (USA), Bono (Ireland),
Joseph Campbell (USA), and Bill Moyers (USA).
Then there was the familiar story of the difference between heaven
and hell:
A man is granted a wish to see heaven and hell before he dies. In
hell he sees a beautiful meadow and under a tree: a large table
with all sorts of amazing good food and everyone seated around.
When he gets closer he sees that no one is eating and everyone is
starving - their elbows are locked and they can’t reach down to
their plates. In heaven he sees the exact same scene, and when he
gets closer the elbows are locked here too, but everyone is happy
and eating - each person is feeding the one across from him… in
heaven the people are feeding each other.
However, the clear winner by far - because so many people suggested
it - is the story of Stone Soup, which goes something like this:
Once there was a great famine. People jealously hoarded whatever
food they could find, hiding it from family, friends and neighbors.
One day a wanderer came into the village, sold a few odds and ends,
then began asking where he could stay for the night.
“There’s nothing to eat in the whole area,” he was told. “Better
move on.”
“Oh, I have all the food I could eat, and more,” the wanderer said.
“In fact, I was thinking of making some stone soup to share with
everyone in this village.”
He pulled a huge iron cauldron from his wagon, filled it with water,
and built a fire under it. Then, with great ceremony, he took an
ordinary-looking stone from the ground, cleaned it carefully, and
dropped it into the water.
By now, hearing the rumor of food, most everyone had come to the
wanderer’s campsite. As he sniffed the “broth” and smacked his lips
in anticipation, hunger began to overcome the villagers’ distrust.
“Ahh,” the wanderer said to himself loudly, “I do like a tasty stone
soup. Of course, stone soup with potatoes. That’s hard to beat.”
Soon a villager approached hesitantly, holding a potato he’d retrieved
from its hiding place under his bed, and added it to the pot. “Beautiful!”
cried the peddler. “You know, I once had stone soup with a bit of
beef as well, and it was fit for a king.”
The village butcher managed to find a bit of beef…and so it went,
through onions, carrots, cabbage, turnips, kale, chicken, rosemary,
thyme, pepper, corn, lamb, mushrooms, and so on, until there was
the most incredible soup for everyone to share. It was a feast!
And a real celebration followed, late into the night.
The next day the villagers offered the wanderer a great deal of
money for his recipe, but he refused to sell — telling them they
could do just as well on their own — and he left. From that time
on, long after the famine had ended, everyone reminisced about the
finest soup they’d ever had.
Now, when times became especially hard once again, everyone who
was present, and those children who have been born since, gathered
around and made a pot on their own.
I heard, once, a group of people made a pot even when times were
good!
Seth Kahan is a writer, speaker and consultant. “My primary focus
is high-stakes collaboration, helping leaders, executives and change
agents work better together. My goal is to make real contributions
to the ways professionals work together, especially when people
from different disciplines and cultures collaborate to address world-class
problems.” To learn more about my work, visit his website: http:www.SethKahan.com
|